Comments

Yes, it's good that we finally know what "Indo-Pacific" means. It will be even less of a stretch for the government to stay above 90 per cent than we thought. However, even as precisified, this geographic term is unhelpful. Touching shared oceans is hardly a sensible criterion for aid rationing. What's more, this property is absent in the case of a few recipients -- Afghanistan, Bhutan, Laos, Mongolia, Nepal -- and present in the case of quite a few poor non-recipients -- Comoros, Djibouti, Madagascar and Yemen to the west, and various struggling countries in Central America to the north-east. (Presumably the Red Sea nations of Sudan and Eritrea will be at a disadvantage because they face a mere inlet of the Indian Ocean.) Assuming that none of the currently excluded Indo-Pacific countries will partake of Australia's aid budget anytime soon, it would have been better to stick with the line that we are primarily an Asia-Pacific donor, and explain bilateral support outside our region on a case by case basis, without reference to ocean views.

Oh - sorry. That last comment was fro me not jo. I posted using her iPad and auto complete did the rest. Terence

I applaud the World Bank for its wake up call and encouragement to Australia to open its gates to Pacific Islanders especially people from Kiribati and Solomon Islands who are severely affected by the effects of climate change and sea level rise. It is true that if Australia should adopt the New Zealand Pacific Access Quota it would make a lot of difference to the lives of Pacific families who has experienced hardship and poverty due to the effects of climate change. Not only that but Australia could really benefit from the inputs of Pacific Islanders who are honest and hard workers. Cheers.

Thanks Chris, Just quickly as I am on a supposedly computer free beach holiday. If I had to recommend one work of fiction with much relevance for development and change I would say the Wire. maybe somewhat depressing when it comes to illustrating how hard it is to change things but also excellent at showing how complex the world is and how rigid structural factors are. And there are still small wins amongst everything. There is a good book on the wire and public health policy which shows that some of the successes in real world Baltimore have been bigger than one might take from the fiction alone.

Could not agree with you more about the power of fiction. We use <a href="http://www.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/pdf/WP/WP61.pdf" rel="nofollow">this great paper</a> by Lewis, Rodgers and Woolcock in one subject of our Master of International Development at La Trobe. We then get students to read one of a growing list of novels we have selected and write a reflexive piece on what thoughts about social change have been provoked by the book. It seems to work well. I was thinking of doing something similar using <a href="http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-6491" rel="nofollow">this paper</a> by the same authors on cinema and development. Maybe you could get the ball going with a review from developmental/social change perspective of a recent movie. Selma? Pride? Other suggestions anyone?

Hi Robin, Just reading DFAT's "Performance of Australian Aid 2013-14" and it notes that for the purpose of measuring progress against the "Focusing on the Indo-Pacific region" target, "the Indo-Pacific refers to developing countries in the Asia Pacific (including South and West Asia), in the Indian Ocean and those bordering the Indian Ocean in East and Southern Africa". So Africa is part of the Indo-Pacific - or at least parts of it such as Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, South Africa, Somalia. Nice to finally have a definition (of sorts). Joel

One of the problems with this analysis is the rather vague nature of the phrase 'work for free', its quite important to define what you mean by work, to understand that most work in a subsistence society in not wage labour but leads to benefits further down the track. While doing research with Duncan Ironmonger, the founder of the methodology of the measurement of unpaid work, in the Pacific in the 1980s he told me 'work is something you could pay other people to do', thus child care is work, playing tennis is clearly not work because you can't pay other people to do it for you. Giving your opinion to researchers is not work as you couldn't pay someone else to do it or it wouldn't be your opinion. Participation takes time, and researchers should learn more of the techniques of mobilizing volunteers used in Civil Society organizations to make it worthwhile for people to participate in voluntary activity without actually paying them. Another principle of good volunteer management is that volunteers don't take the jobs of paid workers (except in a very brief or emergency situation). Unfortunately in Timor-Leste not many civil society organizations understand why the Board of an NGO is not paid, but the staff are. Nevertheless the Board would disappear if they did not think it was worth their while to participate, Often some small token payments are made or transport and food made available to help them feel it is worthwhile being on a board or a committee, but it is they who employ the paid staff and determine their salaries. Tomas Freitas is right that the coming of the so called 'aid industry' to Timor undermined the volunteer spirit. No one was paid to engage in the struggle for self-determination, yet it was a great action of co-ordination, will and voluntary initiative. Thus is sad to see so few actual membership NGOs mobilizing volunteers for their own style of development. Many tasks for which community members historically would volunteer in the past, like cleaning up the village, were done because people would benefit by the improved conditions, now they sit around and wait for someone to pay them. Management of volunteers didn't seem to be one of the skills looked for in aid workers during the UNTAET period. The UNDP will be publishing its Human Development Report this year on Work, a noted improvement on the use of the word 'employment' much loved by the World Bank, it is not surprising that Timorese are confused and hostile when so many competing economic analyses are presented to them by different agencies, supposedly here to help them. Helen Hill, Vila Verde, Dili

A very interesting post and thread. A similar phenomena also occurs in Dili. I have experienced ngo’s flying in to a full schedule of interviews and focus groups. Often these are with members of the community who supply an invaluable insight into the topic under review – as volunteers. Of course, the community member is aware that the expert has a well paid job and lifestyle yet they are not receiving any compensation for their time. A very delicate situation. But I also agree with other contributors who speak of the danger of payment luring non-interested parties just for the money! At a minimum I would like to see the ngo follow up with these groups, acknowledging that the ngo is appreciative of the time and contribution the community member has given and providing them with some insight into the findings of the report. Such an action would show respect. There is a danger In Timor, where there is such dependence on volunteers (don’t get me started on the invaluable role of the volunteer teacher), that volunteer-fatigue could set in.

The National Library of Australia's Pandora web archives also contain complete snapshots of AusAID's web site at various, and quite numerous, points in time: http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/gov/*/http://www.ausaid.gov.au.

I who work as male advocator in Wosera Gawi in East Sepik Province of PNG. I support to end violence & bring peace & justice in surrounding communities in my country. From St Anna Crisis Centre (SACC) ESP,PNG.

Don’t forget the thing called ‘the Commonwealth’ (previously ‘the British Commonwealth’) and the 3Ds (development, defence and diplomacy) in the UK's aid programs that are increasingly focussing on security. Australia has its own priority interests that certainly warrants more than 0.22% of GNI. Besides, we enjoy a higher GDP per capital than the UK; and Australians are very generous private donors. You only have to look at cricket to get an appreciation of how effective the British are at providing assistance, though. Their program has been so successful that recipients (e.g. Bangladesh) are playing at the highest level – oh, wait a minute, did Bangladesh turf England out of the World Cup quarter finals last weekend?

Great observation Melissa and Gordon. Being also guilty of taking up large amounts of community members time in unpaid "participatory" initiatives I wrestle with the same dilemma. Volunteering your time for these sort of things is great but people have other tasks needing attention. If you were to pay a fee however you might get people turning up for the fee and not really interested in what is being discussed (although sometimes a free lunch and a t-shirt might generate the same in a poor community). Not sure how you resolve this. Related issue is payment or not for actual project activities. I once managed a program in East Timor that spent a lot of time working with communities on sustainable agriculture. It was slow work but eventually enough people started to adopt sustainable practices (such as afro-forestry and no burning) that we could see real progress and a commitment to change with people seeing the benefits themselves and initiating changes without payment. A bigger agency came in and started doing similar work but with more rigid project timelines and targets. Things were not going well so they started paying people to plant trees in agroforestry plots so they could meet their targets and satisfy their donors. A community member came to me and explained that they could see our approach would work in the long run but the money from the other agency was needed too much and they had to take up the paid work on the other project and go slow on the other work. I said it was perfectly understandable. In the long run the bigger project failed and the smaller project eventually generated lasting improvements in sustainable land management and food security. That said, I still feel it is big ask as a well paid western development worker to take up large amount of peoples time, without payment, in seemingly endless consultations for "participatory" scoping studies, reviews, evaluations etc. Agree that the problem merits further focussed (and paid) research.