Comments

Hi Jo Thanks for your contribution - I think you have raised some interesting points. One of the things that struck me about Jack's presentation was how many of the key 'outsiders' were ex-insiders - or occupied some kind of hybrid space in which they managed to be both. I hope your presentation goes well at AAC.

I should add that the criminal responsibility/sim card registration issue was central in the Australian Haneef case: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhamed_Haneef

This was a really interesting read. Unfortunately I didn't have time to read all the comments, but a couple stuck out: 1) Cracking down on activists as a motivation for the scheme. Does the registration therefore mean that mobile phone users cannot participate in online discussions anonymously? 2) The possibility that national security could be worsened if corrupt officials are able to get their hands on otherwise private data (if I read one of the comments correctly). I'm also interested in what happens if people share a mobile phone. Is the person whose name the SIM is registered to responsible in any way for crime committed by another person who is using that phone?

Hi Amanda, Great and timely write up From my observation, most people living in the rural areas are yet to register their Sim Cards and possibly will face deactivation of their Sim Cards.

Hi Tess. Thanks for the review. I haven't yet had the pleasure of reading Jack's book, but you've done a great job of making me move it up the list. I wanted to respond to your sense of frustration, drawing on my research. I looked at how aid policy goals changed - the high level purpose and organisational arrangements of aid policy in a donor government. (Note, I looked at quality changes, not quantity.) I think my findings show there is plenty external actors can do to change/influence aid policy. What I found key to change were individuals who behaved entrepreneurially, and who were connected to a network that cut across society and government. This network was connected by shared ideas about a donor's interests overseas and the purpose of aid. External actors (as in those who were not part of the political or professional executive), had power in setting the agenda for change and driving change through. It was just a matter of thinking about power and the rules of the system, and how to negotiate the system to advance their preferred change. So, as an external actor, you do have the ability to influence aid policy - it is not all an internal stitch-up. My research focused on New Zealand's aid, but other authors have also found that external actors can influence aid policy (eg: Lunsgaarde, Szent-Ivanyi and Lightfoot). Come to my talk with Ben Day at the upcoming Australasian Aid Conference, and you can hear about what it means for individuals to behave entrepreneurially.

Australia as a middle power nation in a fast changing South East Asian region and having China at the heart of global and regional change should place its foreign aid program as a matter of high priority. Less powerful nations in the region are already under the strong influence of China's economic might. A foreign aid program would be beneficial in laying some ground work for future relationships with those countries. Howes underscores the importance of leadership and the lack of it in this area. Unfortunately, the current political dynamic in Australia suggests that there is unlikely to be any change in a population which is more in a European/American identity.

Hi everyone, Happy new year, 2018. I am originally from Timor Leste, residing in countryside . I was wondering, to whom I may direct my questions regarding creating an SWP agency here in my countryside Aileu Remexio . I will be grateful for a guide. Tnks in advance, Samson.

Hi Amanda, Great blog by the way! Yes it was predicted well ahead there’d be a delay in having all mobile phone users register their SIM cards on the initial deadline, thus the extension date wasn’t a surprise to many. However, I am not sure the extended deadline of April 30 gives enough time for the exercise as the country’s demography and geography does stand in the way. I also believe there hasn’t been enough awareness done to educate the public and many are already linking this exercise to ‘signs of the last days’ or ‘Mark of the beast (666)’. One question I pose, however, is are these mobile phone companies willing to incur added expenses by sending agents out into the remote parts of the country to assist in the registration process rather than having the people meet the expense of transportation and meals etc. just to get to the nearest centre where they can have their SIM registered? Being a local myself, I know how daunting it is for a mere villager to save enough money in order to make trips into town. But then again, I know for sure the operators will not willingly deploy agents as that’d be a costly exercise apart from what is already being spent on advertising and marketing campaigns. With the current economic scenario we’re in, companies/organisations are serious on cutting down costs. That being said, I say the registration exercise be extended to a year, giving enough time for mobile phone operators and NICTA to educate the public, targeting those is remote parts of the country. The registration process can ride on the back of the awareness exercise in order to cut down costs while reaching the majority at the same time. Just my thoughts though 🙂

Really positive to hear that ODE has made such progress within DFAT, but the ingredients of that success in regards to integration seem to be that they were 'largely left alone' and a more pragmatic evaluation framework. Imagine the gains across the ODA board if other areas had been 'largely left alone'. Not very hard to mount the argument that the ODE experience only reinforces what has gone wrong everywhere else? It's great they ended up completing 4 of the 5 strategic evaluations they'd committed to in 2017 - credit very much due. But given 50% of them were published 4 days before Christmas, it's perhaps an argument for a rolling workplan with individual deadlines rather than an annual workplan. Christmas reading they are not. We also await the 2018 plan- which based on last year wont be published till mid Feb, which might be another reason to rethink the annual workplan idea?

The social issues surrounding the SIM Card Registration exercise are covered so well in this article. The one that strikes me most is the one about providing identification or NID for that matter to be able to register. I've registered the three SIM cards I use for communication - Digicel, Bmobile and Telikom. The latter two were registered upon being bought last year. But the Digicel one took time and had to go through a process described in the article. I have an NID card so was bit easier for me but my brothers and some friends couldn't do so right away as they didn't have accepted proof of identity. They had to go and look for K2 before registering their SIM cards, based on a ready -made Stat Dec. The same thing happened when I went home in Central Province for holidays during the festive season. Village people were more like given no choice but to pay before registering. Why? Because they need the phone with the SIM to use for communication with the outside world and especially for emergency or needs-based purposes. That's has been there improved source of communication and development, if you like, since the competition game was introduced for mobile companies in PNG. But unfortunately, many are not likely to meet this and will affect their lives. Something really worth considering. It's like taking a step back after taking a leap.

I am also uncomfortable that commercial entities will have my personal details, but it's not uncommon in today's business world. Its a little housekeeping. NICTA is putting pressure on telecoms companies for those said reasons, but I'm inclined to believe its a scramble to leverage the struggling National ID card (NID) process. We've not been able to adequately conduct a census, to then make projections to then plan ahead and be prepared to handle the load. The pressure is on our government to get those stats right in order to do business with global institutions/governments - because our government has not been able to achieve some of our core goals. Primary Education is an example - this relies heavily on an effective census. Having said that, it is not as clear cut as this - I understand the layered faculties that determine government's success. I do hope, however, that NICTA's SIM registration exercise results in an improved governance process if anything. The advancements in telecoms has greatly increased citizen voice, especially with regards to accessing the media and decision-makers. So we can be diligent to ensure that NICTA does not use its SIM database to curtail these achievements. My 2 toea.

Hi Amanda, thank you for this write up. i) Registering via Digicel It is indeed an issue registering people in the remote areas. My Digicel number is a CUG. However, Digicel agents came to my workplace and I was told to register again. I still don't know why I registered my CUG number again. This makes me to question the safety of our privacy (personal identity and information) at these telecommunication companies' database. ii) Registering via Bemobile For my Bemobile, I registered it at an outlet at Vision City. This was fast and easy and I used my Nambawan Super ID card. iii) Remote areas registration My mum and dad and uncles are in the village in Enga Province and have not registered. So I asked the Bemobile agent if I could register their numbers under my identity information. The answer was YES! WOW! And I did register my mum, dad and uncle's numbers under me but I provided their names. This is with Bemobile. I don’t know if Digicel and Telikom are doing this. It’s a good idea by Bemobile. iv) Data collected I personally think that getting date of birth and too much information is necessary and is risky. We cannot give everything about us away to a system that is in question about data protection etc. v) Too early I also think SIM registration is too early for the entire country. I am saying this based on a few reasons. One: Vast majority in rural areas will suffer when numbers get deactivated. Therefore, deadline should be extended to 2019. Two: Awareness must be done before registration because many Christians think this is 666 making its way in. vi) Enemy risk Some politicians, businessman/women, etc. need to protect themselves by using more than two mobile numbers. I personally, use two-three Digicel numbers to protect myself because I have trouble back in my village. This helps protect me. There are stories that individual's mobile numbers and locations are getting out from the telecommunication companies data base to enemies and increasing risks. We need to hold 2-3 numbers to make our movements unpredictable. Only the ones at risk would know what I am talking about here. I will make it short and stop here. vii) APEC is not the true reason I personally think APEC security is not the reason. It’s an EXCUSE to actually fast track this SIM registration so that politicians can crack down on activists who are so vocal on our political, social and environmental issues. I am saying this because the sim registration doesn’t seem to consider the ones in the remote areas and looks like targeting the ones in the towns and cities. We all have read and seen activists being vocal on social media on politicians and issues affecting our economy and well-being. And this SIM registration is the true strategy implemented as per the new cyber policy to crack down on these activists. The illiterate in remote areas done go on social media so they don’t matter. The ones in cities going on social media matter the most! This SIM registration exercise is serving a minority’s SELF-INTEREST. Thus, it will supress freedom of speech and Lord knows what happens next. viii) Too Early SIM registration is too early. It was not planned. It just popped out form desperation. As some of the commenters have said, there was not proper plan upon thorough research to include people in remote areas. ix) Registering mobile with NID We are also registering our mobile numbers during NID registration. What is this about and what’s the SIM registration about? ix) Register SIM after NID It’s simple. Let us complete NID registration thoroughly covering the entire country before jumping to SIM registration. I believe once NID is completed successfully, SIM registration will be very easy. Probably, NICTA and NID offices are recruiting dumb consultants. Larem mipla mekim wanpla samtimg pastem na narapla behain. Inap lo faul faul na confusim mipla just lo kisim big name. Amanda, thank you for this opportunity. Stanley Spenzii Mark Corporate Communication Professional