Comments

The real cause of climate change is human deviation from the natural ways of living and the land is groaning and it's waging war against humanity. Romans 8:19-22. The earth is defiled by its inhabitants therefore it's heading to it's desolation Isaiah 24:4-6. Globalist needs to tell humans to mend their ways of living.

We have forever blamed corruptions, stolen ballots, votes rigging and the list goes on. I personally think its not real cause of the problem why women are not elected into Parliament. The real issues at end is the voters people who turned up at the polling booth and cast their votes for male candidates. Raicoast District in Madang, is a classic example, people turn out to vote for female candidate who is now elected MP. We cannot continuous deny the fact that voters choices and reasons why they don't vote for female candidates. I have few female colleagues who went out to exercise their rights to vote. When they returned I asked them if they have voted for a female candidates whether in Regional or Open Districts. And their reply was astonishing . They said No, they didn't like the candidates and their policies.

In Markham District, a female candidate by the name of Gengewe Ganzik, a senior accountant of the Morobe Provincial Government was running strongly in second place when the ballot papers got burnt and counting ended prematurely. In one ballot box, she got near 76 per cent of the total votes, the incumbent got 15 per cent and 8 per cent was split between the other 31 male candidates. Of these 31 male candidates, nearly 90 per cent of them got nil votes from this box. This box is from where she did community services ("han-mak" in pidgin) and is strongly related to as "a family member" and seen as an esteemed elite professional. Not to generalise but an opinion from this observation is that women candidates stand a high chance of being elected to parliament if they (1) have a university qualification with good working experience under their belt, (2) they have done some communities services, meet some cultural obligations such as supporting haus cry, (3) and build an image that voters can easily relate to as family or someone close to them, and will be there for them during times of need.

Spot on, Paul.

To solve this problem, why not the government set a Law to assessed all intending candidates with a criteria...

Digicel has done a great job. Telecommunication Sector is one of the most important sectors today, as we are living in a Technological world. Digicel captures almost all parts of PNG geographical locations enabling everyone to be connected. PNG world have change in the last 15 years, everything seem to be more easier now. Access to information is one of the very key factor helping citizens to improve in advancing their knowledge. In the past it is harder to gain extra knowledge and most university students rely heavily on the library books. Compare it to today you can access information and send information any where you are. Digicel has bring a big change to the country.

Can we bring some more ideas into this and have propose it to our Government

What ever comparison you make is irrelevant. Fact is there were so many guns and people were killed. As you point out, no one should be killed for standing in line to vote. 2022 is the one size fits all for electoral corruption in PNG. The winners were corrupt power hungry politicians and their henchmen.

I meant to add a link to this post as well, which is illuminating on Tongan attitudes to migration: https://devpolicy.org/tongas-future-in-one-poll-20180904/

Hi Jonathon. Thank you for your comment, I’m glad to hear about your positive engagement with the scheme. On your first point, the use of protection visas as a defacto work permit is something we’ve talked about on this blog before (https://devpolicy.org/absconding-for-asylum-20220204/). I’m not sure if you’ve seen that the new government is proposing to cover travel costs for Pacific workers, so the upfront costs (apart from the first $300) will no longer be borne by employers, but by the government. Under these new settings, there will (maybe) be less risk that employers will be completely out of pocket, and there will be less incentive to recover costs as quickly. We will have to wait and see what the new government is thinking on that front. On your second point, I definitely agree that workers should be able to choose when and how to pay back their costs. What this proposal is about is making sure that there is at least a guaranteed minimum after deductions – that the ‘small income’ requested – isn’t too small, and is enough to live off. If workers are saving $17k in a season, it shouldn’t be too much an issue – maybe only a few weeks that it would fall below and be carried forward. Perhaps the flip side is that in high earning weeks if workers want to voluntarily pay off their costs more quickly they should also be given that choice, while still having a safety net. I suppose my view is that this idea would ensure consistency across the board and give greater public assurance that workers are being treated well. Cheers Evie

Hello I have been a approved employer for approximately 6 years. I consider the program to be a brilliant scene have have found it beneficial for my company. When seasonal workers have arrived at my business I have found them to be excellent employees. I further am aware that my employees are incredibly frugal with there money with many able to save up to 17000 Australian dollars on a 9 month placement. Further most of my seasonal workers wish to pay off their deductions quickly with many requesting to only receive a small income at the beginning with the rest working to paying off the deductions. My concerns with the proposal are 2. 1 - many seasonal workers arrive in Australia with the intention to abscond. In my experience I employed 20 seasonal workers through a labour hire company (Jobs Australia). Of the 20 seasonal workers 10 absconded within the first month of placement. Jobs Australia had to wear that up front cost with no return. Seasonal workers are well aware of the government loop hole to claim asylum which will in turn have you granted a Bridging Visa A with work rights. They then move to Sydney and work in construction or factory work. I am well aware that the 10 seasonal workers are currently working in Sydney using this loop hole. 2 - like I stated earlier the seasonal workers who work for me a brilliant savers. If rainy days occur many prefer to pay their costs such as rent with their savings rather than letting them accrued. If you have any questions please give me a call Regards

Farmers are never appreciated for their hard work, the exporter and third party make a profit on their hard work. Farmers need to be educated on the value of their organic products and be able to market at right price. Western world has a short supply of organic produce, most produce have huge toxins from chemicals they use. Farmers in PNG must not gamble the value of their produce at the cost of greedy third parties. Knowledge is power and the better educated our farmers are the value of their produce will go up.